Section 6f

If your net search took you directly to this site page (no logo header) then CLICK HERE to start at the Main Page.

This section is NOT about football (as the title of this page might suggest), nor is it about necrophilia. This section is NOT about fucking the dead, mutilating or abusing the body of someone's dead relative to satisfy sexual lust. What this section IS about is pointing out the sometimes morally hypocritical and general social misconceptions regarding what is termed as true abuse of the dead, using my own perceptions as a basis for these observations.

A common response from many people regarding the act of necrophilia, and hence sometimes reflected in our laws, is that sexual activity with the dead is an act of corpse abuse or abuse of the dead. This is not an attempt to justify my fantasy interest nor the real life actions of others but rather to present alternative perceptions in order to stimulate personal thought. Personally, I tend to allow more credence to the person who objects to necrophilia on purely religious or personal grounds of morality (a measure of personal indignity) than I do to the person who simply proclaims that the acts are abuse of the dead. But like most other things in life terminology and definitions are all relative to each individual. Everyone's idea of what constitutes abuse or indignity of anything varies widely. But let's explore the various things that can happen to a dead person that historically and socially seem to be acceptable.

As a society we seem to want to cast the concept of 'dignity' regarding approaching death and after death with a level of importance. We've all heard the phrase 'death with dignity' and it's usually presented in the context that death is inevitable.. or imminent... with a certain individual. Terminal cancers and other illnesses immediately come to mind and there's the natural tendency to think that spending your last days within the confines of the somewhat emotionally sterile environment of a clinic, rest home, or hospital, is not a dignified or caring way to die. Hospice care is a result of this concept over the last 30 years in that the terminal state of a patient is recognized and their final days should be spent in comfortable and familiar surroundings and loved ones. The contrary thought traditionally held up to that point was that as long as one is alive that there is hope, regardless of any terminal diagnosis, that it's better to stay in a hospital to the end so that all the mechanisms to prolong your life are readily available. Well, the social consciousness shifted and use of hospice care is a legally accepted form of medical treatment... all in the name of trying to preserve a definition of human dignity to the end. Yet, if you look deeper at the concept, it's remarkably close to assisted suicide simply by allowing for the patient to provide a living will and a do-not-resucitate instruction.. and legalizing hospice care, all designed to NOT encourage or prolong life but rather in accepting death.

But as we all know not everyone dies from terminal disease.. or even naturally. Fatal accidents, of any kind, are generally far from being 'dignified' ways to die.. but accidents are a part of living day to day. Auto accidents particularly tend to mangle and mutilate a body, many times to the point where it's suggested it shouldn't be viewed at a wake. Airline accidents, deaths due to fire, some drownings, etc, manytimes result in a body not being recoverable at all (floods, sea tragedies, etc.), either due to not locating it or the body simply being consumed or vaporized (as in the case of many on 9/11). The latter not even allowing for some 'dignified' funeral.

Combat deaths are unique of sorts and carry with them their own defined measure of dignity. Generally speaking, a combat death is usually a very violent death that more often than not mutilates the body to extremes. Yet historically a soldier prided himself on dying by the sword or in the defense of some cause as dignity was translated to honor in spite of how mutilated their body got during their death.; death as a prisoner or enslavement being considered non-honorable or undignified ways to die in spite of their body being left largely intact. Consider yet how the navies of the world dispose of their dead (although modern navies do attempt to return bodies to shore during peacetime). They put them in bags, weighted the bags, and dumped them overboard where they descended the depths, perhaps crushing from the pressure, but ultimately decomposing into fish food over time. Hardly dignified to most landlubbers since the relatives on shore don't get a body to bury in their own way, but to the seafarer it's considered a dignified 'burial' because of their 'love of the sea'. To those responsible for the ship and crew it's the only means by which the dead could be disposed of to avoid disease. Making a shipboard ceremony of it was a natural progression to make a solemn event more emotionally acceptable rather than just an insensitive issue of public health.

(more coming)

I feel it's important that people in general understand what actually can occur to their dead loved ones. In this case here is a pictoral of a typical autopsy. Now, an autopsy need not include this entire cut & slice process. Sometimes it's certain parts of the body, like the head... or it's simply a matter of drawing blood and getting tissue samples more localized on the body. But generally speaking, these pictures represent a typical autopsy.

Now, let's set this up a bit to properly understand the effects. Note the larger pic below. The woman looks to be perhaps in her 30's to early 40's as her body does shows a bit of age maturity from the look of her skin yet she still retains a fair shape. From her tummy one might decern that she's had at least one child.. hence she was probably a mother with a husband and child. The discoloration on her chest could suggest an injury, and the tubes in her left arm would surely suggest she was alive for a period of time, thusly she was probably an accident victim of some sort and not likely died of any protracted disease (she shows no sign of weight loss nor any muscle xxxxxxxx due do a long hospital stay or dibilitating illness) or murdered. The fact that she is undergoing an autopsy suggests itself that her death was most probably unnatural, hence in most municipalities unnatural deaths are all autopsied by law.

So, given all that, this woman has loved ones.. probably a husband who loved making love to her... kids who loved her. We could probably extrapolate correctly that her tan lines across her breasts and lower abdomen suggest she wore a bikini and as such had some preference for the outdoors and a good self-esteem for how she looked as a woman. The accident itself was an unexpected tragedy in their lives... and now their loved one is being dissected... and for nothing other than the fact that it's required by law. As you view these pics you tell me you would want to see your wife and/or loved hacked like this... and you tell me this isn't abuse. Her body will never be loved ever again. She will never feel a kiss on her lips (note the last pic to see her lips), she will never feel a loved one inside her vagina, sucking on her nipples.. giving her orgasms... all the things that are the essence of human feeling, instinct, and desire to reproduce. Her husband having his memories of how sexy she looked.. and then imagining this happening to her once pristine body.
Pursuit of science? Well, if you want your loved one's body used for that, and organ donation, that is your call and to some measure that could provide some solice to the relatives knowing their mother/daughter's demise might have some broader meaning. But when a law that dictates an across-the-board requirment for slicing and dicing when someone dies in some accident something is not right.
Pursuit of justice? Well, that's the reason there is a law at all, of course. Any unnatural act is presummed to be a potential criminal event. Although, determining 'cause of death' is more what the authorities prefer to call it but you'd think that could be done in other ways other than cracking a chest open and cutting the ribs out. In reality most accidental deaths are not like CSI, Law & Order, or the other forensic TV shows. They are totally needless in most cases and this is supported by some recent statistics (which I cannot readily produce, but trust me anyway; use your common sense and compare the numbers of your state/country between unnatural deaths total to total autopsies requiring further investigation).

As to how all this fits in with necrophilia.. well, simply for the sake of comparison of what constitutes 'abuse', this permitted abuse looks far more devestating to a loved one's body than what some laws suggest are the effects of someone simply having sex with a dead person. Matter of perspective.