|
Just Where IS The Best Place To Meet?
The
safest and most effective way to meet is usually what I call the
two-stage meeting. You first meet up in a public place (usually
while it's still daylight) then decide from there where to go, be it an
evening on the town or straight to the motel room. That gives you
a chance to 'eyeball' the person, exchange a few amenities, then decide
if you should stay with them or leave. Public places tend to be
casual restaurants, like a local Denny's, a library, or museum.
Generally someplace with people around in the event you need to draw
attention to yourself if your partner gets out of line. But much
of deciding whether to stay or not is your own gut feel.. drawing on
all the elements we discussed here.
If you're a woman a good strategy is
to park somewhere away from the windows of the restaurant or building
you are meeting in, in order to reduce the risk of your partner getting
your vehicle license number and discription. Also, it's good to
tell a friend in advance who you are meeting and where. If that's
too embarrassing then have a friend call you on your cell phone at a
predetermined time, like 30 minutes, into your meeting. You could
even go so far as to set up a prearranged code or 'duress' word that
tells who's calling if you are ok or in harm's way. While the
cell phone call might serve to interrupt your meeting slightly at least
your partner is aware that someone else... is aware. Before you
hang up from your friend tell them you'll check back with them in a
couple hours.. and make sure your meeting partner hear's it.
If the initial meeting turns sour and
you decide not to continue it leave the public place first... make sure
he doesn't follow you out the door and to your car. Maybe make
your cell phone call to a friend as you are leaving to let them know
where you are headed.
Are You A Cyber-Liar?
We all know that Internet chat
communities are great places to be ourselves or to be someone
completely different; living out a fantasy of someone we might like to
be that we might fear acting out in real life either because it's
illegal or as simple as being because our nature doesn't condone
it. In most cases this kind of activity is harmless.. an
acknowledged back-and-forth game of seduction, teasing, and enticement
in an environment of anonymity that brings security to all
parties. After all, you can go as far as you want and there's
always the off switch on your PC.
Now typically we can probably accept
all that as life on the net and perhaps many of you even reading this
has toyed with being an alter-ego in a chat room at one time or
another. But the caveat is to be wary of those who would carry
this misrepresentation as a basis for meeting in real life. While
it's not likely someone who you have been chatting and getting to know
for a number of months will get to the point of meeting you and you
discover their gender is all wrong, the risk is still there..
especially when it comes to getting your feelings hurt when you
discover the fraud just before you plan to meet.
For example, on two different
occassions I have been duped by heavyset women who misrepresented
themselves to me through pics and chat references as being much slimmer
and attractive. While it's one thing to fantasize and play it's
another thing altogether to willfully deceive to engage your emotional
committment. In both these cases the women were quite obviously
emotionally stressed over their own image that they felt their only way
to get attention was to develop a relationship using fake pics.
Now, while I would agree in the 'Shallow Hal' theory that people are
far more than how they might look the tragedy with both these women is
that over the months of our chatting they encouraged responses from me
on their appearence as represented from those fake pics. In my
case, I do not hide my particular physical preference for slimmer women
(I even mention it on my site). So the sad part is that I was
unknowingly part of feeding their self-image distress each time I
expressed appreciation for their attractiveness or when we engaged in
sexual chatter. In both cases the women 'confessed' their true
appearence when it became apparent that the relationship was getting to
the point of a real life meeting. The sad part is when I ended up
rejecting them it had little to do with their true heavy appearence but
rather the fact that I had been an unknowing contributer to their
suffering during our chats, and the fact the relationship thus far was
being started on a lie and falsehood. In these cases a phone call
revealed little to their real appearence but in both instances the
women were reluctant to provide more than the initial pics they had
sent me... thus cauisng some slight wonderment. So while I had my
emotions torn with dissappointment it was limited only to the
cyber-relationships and never made real-life.
Meeting for Sex: Safe or
Otherwise
Okay, you've gotten to the point of meeting and you've
decided that in your relationship that the possibility of sex when you
meet is a desire, or in the least a valid consideration. How do
you handle it.. safely?
(There is really nothing here that is specific to Internet
real-life meetings. This is also relevent to relationships
started in real life)
Let's presume for the moment that
you've done all your homework as outlined above and that there is no
question about meeting this person. All your information 'ducks'
are in order about this person and everything feels right. But
you are also thinking of having sex with this person.. after all,
that's probably part of what brought you together on the net
anyway. Presumably you've already discussed this option with your
cyber-partner. This falls into the areas outlined above in
developing dialog and getting enough information and feeling exchanged
between the two of you so that you both are tuned into exactly what the
other wants or expects from a real life meeting. This two way
communication should also include the dimension you wish to take
regarding 'safe sex'.
We all pretty much accept that 'safe
sex' can mean either pregnancy protection and/or protection from
disease. But only the two of you can decide for yourselves what
risks you wish to take. Obviously the whole thing comes down to
trusting the other person on the information they give you. But I
think for most of us the real issue is about, do you use a condom
between you or not. Condomizing is the only sure way of avoiding
any sexual risk but it also lacks in some very significant areas, like
a loss of spontenaity as well as a significant loss of feeling to both
partners. You've both have chatted about this. Perhaps your
partner is on birth control or has had a vasectomy. That would
sure take care of the pregnancy protection part but you really only
have your partner's word on that. And what about disease?
How do you trust someone when they say they are disease-free (they may
truly not know themselves, especially if they've been sexually active
with random partners ).
Well, in real life relationships
there's the obvious development and nurturing trust between two people
over time. Generally people learn about each other and can share
their respective lives on multiple levels in real time and that helps
to foster trust and some level of assurance that your partner is who
they say they are regarding their sexual activities and partners and
sexual practices. Meeting for the first time from the Internet
and deciding on having sex that first time does take a unique measure
of risk because of the lack of real life relationship time that tends
to foster trust. In the end, even between two married people,
engaging in unprotected sex has risk that's minimized soley on
trust. In the end only YOU can determine the amount of risk you
wish to take. That's why it is important to know anything and
everything about your partner.. not only for your immediate physical
safety but also for your medical health as well.
Here's a couple tips regrading the
risks. But remember, even in a marriage of total trust between
two people there is still a personal risk to both parties in having
unprotected sex.
- Did
your partner really have a vasectomy?
One way to check is to physically inspect under each scrotum
for the matching incision scars. You can do this casually as
being part of intimate touching. BUT... while the scars may
be telltale signs of a vasectomy it does not guarantee that your
partner may not have gotten a vasectomy reversal. Reversals
are not all that common to be sure.. but they can be done.
Typical reasons for reversing might be... the guy had a recent divorce
and he expects to marry again and desire children... or, in some cases,
the emotional toll in having a vasectomy can affect sexual performance
so it might be reversed to feel verile again and re-gain sexuality...
or, it might be reversed for perceived medical reasons (I say
'preceived' because to date there is no known medical drawbacks to
having a vasectomy). The only sure way is to bring a microscope
with you and have him masturbate onto a slide and you take a look-see..
presumming you are experienced enough to know what you are looking at.
-Does
your partner take oral birth control?
Other than a blood test, which is not likely to be done in a
motel room, there is NO way to know for sure if she is on the pill or
not.. or even if she's been faithful taking the pills on time and as
prescribed. While there might be a natural desire on the part of
a woman to control pregnancy for the obvious reasons this does not
guarantee she is doing it correctly.
-Is there
anyway to check for STD's with your partner?
Well, even if they come out (which I understand is in the
works) a quickee motel blood/urine test for determining the presence of
HIV there are still the other old nasty favorites that can still pop up
here and there that are difficult to spot. So the answer to the
question is no, and even with technology coming to fruition it's not
likely everything can be checked with one simple test.
What's interesting to note... that the accepted theory on
the human desire for oral sex, or tongue-to-genital contact, is an
instinctual impulse for determining disease or infection with our
intended sexual partner. For example, by using our senses of
sight, taste, and smell we can 'measure up' our intended mate as being
physiologically ready to procreate. In other words, a male can
determine if a willing female is 'clean' enough to receive his sperm...
and a female might determine if a male is 'clean' enough to give her a
child. All this returns to the human instinct on the personal
level to procreate (I discuss all this in greater detail another
section on the site).
I guess what I am suggesting is that if you get to the point
of being that close to your partner then use your common sense.. and
common senses... when all else fails. Sometimes lack of hygiene
can suggest a shady sexual background. But remember, many of the
nastier diseases do not readily become apparent to the five senses.
In the end, the risks are all up to
you to evaluate but with some thought you might be able to minimize
them effectively.
Remember...
the success of any real life meeting is the result of
your desire to meet based on your evaluation of your chat
partner. Thousands of people do it each year... many even end up
getting married. It's okay to meet people from the net.. just do
your homework first.
|